Component s :. His case is bizarre though because he didn't actually kill anyone. Although Koch ridicules the opponent throughout some exerts of the text, the readers are still able to grasp his aggressive and almost certainly serious tone. He currently works in a popular TV courtroom show after serving as a mayor of New York for 12 years.He then goes on to compare the death penalty to finding a cure for cancer in order to convince readers that the death penalty is needed in order to tolerate injustice, it was very persuasive and passionate. However, as his research into how the Oklahoma County OK DA's office and crime lab botched so many death penalty cases, misled juries in court, tampered with or hid evidence, and used junk science to influence outcomes of penalty trial phases, Furhman becomes decidedly against the death penalty. Killing is wrong. The Justice Department upholds the rule of law—and we owe it to the victims and their families to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system. He was a well-rounded scholar with a diverse work history. It is also the fairest justice that can be given to the victims of serious offenses such as cold-blood murders. Despite its age though, I still found it to be extremely thought-provoking. Part 26, scheduled executions for the following individuals: Daniel Lewis Lee, a member of a white supremacist group, murdered a family of three, including an eight-year-old girl. All in all, this was eye-opening and revealing. In this logical system of ideas, each argument is further justified by the use of analogies, if, then… statements, statistics, stories and the use of credible sources experts, scholars.
On May 4,a jury in the U. This argument was not as strong and passionate as the last one and it wasn't very convincing because all it contained were studies and numbers, which can make the reader become less interested in what the author is trying to say.
He argues the ethics and politics towards the importance and support of the death penalty.
Conclusion Although the death penalty is cruel and appears inhumane, it remains the most effective deterrence and the fairest justice that can be given to the victims of serious offenses such as murder.
How to cite this page Choose cite format:.