This will allow the group to develop focus and influence, and motivate them to greater effort. Being a business student, Henry should have insisted on having a leader. However, they struggle to reach to a consensus to find a way to develop a strong business plan.Long-range goals set through strategic planning are translated into activities that will ensure reaching the goal through operational planning. MGI had collaborators from many different backgrounds that provided many of the expertises and skill sets that they needed. In conclusion, Henry should appoint himself as the appropriate team leader for the group. The team had little success thus far working together having experienced conflicts and tensions. Sasha expresses a little about the different characteristics of different group members. Alex saw himself as the mediator able to relate to the two main subgroups. Team members have used commonality and reciprocity to others. Was the MGI Team effective? Even though the team had good debates about the direction of the company, they were disorganized, unstructured and did not lead to any fruition of plan and at the end of the day, the team was certainly behind schedule in development of the business plan. MGI team members lack interdependence behavior.
They have come together in order to complete a task. When dysfunctional conflict and ineffective decision-making impeded the team s progress, team members should consider intervening to improve team functioning with the aim of a changing informal norms and interactions or b restructuring interactions among team members Multiple criteria should be used to evaluate team effectiveness: whilst the MGI team achieved a good outcome in the business plan contest, they did not improve their ability to work together in the future or meet members individual needs A team s diversity, launch activities and ongoing processes are interrelated and they work together to influence team effectiveness.
Time management is highly needed.
MGI did not make the deadline because of its lack of direction and organization. Hauser, Wannawiruch Wiruchnipawan, and Marina Burke.
There was no cohesion; Roman was disagreeing within the Russians and Henry and Dana were disagreeing with Sasha and vice versa. It seems that. The challenge is learning how to deal with the predicaments that occur throughout the different stages of group development.
Structural intervention involves changing the shape or makeup of the team Brett, Bear, and Kern,