This is where the more interesting part of the story begins.
Each one has a very different characteristic than the next, but each contribute to the stories plot line equally. Also the movie demonstrates that actions and behaviors of the twelve jurors.
However, the film "Twelve Angry Men" shows that in the s the judge may fail to fully educate the jury regarding the concept of "reasonable doubt. Furthermore he on many occasions brings the assembly to order defusing aggression and animosity present between some of the jurors.
In all of the twelve jurors, I have chosen Juror 3 and Juror 8 for contrast and comparison. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case San Francisco : Wiley. While deliberating their verdict, the details are revealed.